Integrating Economic Incentives to Promote Recycling in Waste Management

Recycling protects the environment, boosts our economy, and generates jobs. Reducing the amount of trash sent to landfills and combustion facilities, conserving natural resources like timber, water, and minerals, and reducing the need to gather new raw materials all have a positive impact on the environment.

Gaining access to a home resource for materials will provide economic security, promote American manufacturing, and generate jobs in the recycling and manufacturing sectors.

The need for waste recycling services has grown over the past few years as more people are becoming aware of the scope of the issues produced by human waste.

The materials in many modern consumer goods may be easily recycled because of their longevity, offering a workable solution to the problem of waste generation and the growing scarcity of some raw materials.

Large-scale waste recycling operations have been made possible thanks in large part to the rising concern over the consequences of waste on the environment.

Read Also : Complete Steps in Glass Recycling Guide

In addition to suffocating the soil, human waste contains a number of potentially harmful substances that can have a terrible impact on the local environment at the disposal site.

Human populations living close to the dumping site may also face health risks from toxic components in human waste. Incentive programs have been developed for businesses using recycled materials in their production lines.

Given that waste recycling is not always a profitable process for the operators, sustained government support will be essential for the market for waste recycling services.

An important factor driving the market for trash recycling services globally are environmental rules prohibiting inappropriate waste disposal. The global market for waste recycling services has seen an increase in demand thanks to the incentives provided by numerous governments for garbage recycling.

The following are some waste management strategies that integrate financial incentives to encourage recycling:

1. Generator Incentives

Pay-As-You-Throw; restructuring residential garbage fees is among the best instances of an incentive that has demonstrated its excellent value over the previous ten years.

The pay-as-you-throw programs can significantly reduce wastes, according to research by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), the California Integrated Waste Management Board, and many others.

Even in towns with required curbside recycling and diversion programs, Skumatz Economic Research Associates discovered in a thorough research for the Solid Waste Association of North America that such “variable rate” schemes can increase diversion by an additional 8 to 13 percentage points.

2. Incentives for businesses

Businesses are more interested in waste prevention, reuse, recycling, and composting the more expensive garbage collection and disposal are.

This is especially true if the firms may gain from recycling by cutting back on garbage collection and disposal services, including container size and quantity as well as pickup frequency. If the amount of recyclables collected from small companies is comparable to that from residents, several communities now offer “free” collection of such materials.

In some places, franchised carriers are required to offer recycling service discounts. To encourage businesses to reduce their waste at the source or recycle, haulers may be forced to charge businesses for recycling services at rates that are at least 50% to 80% of the expenses of disposing of those items.

Additionally, haulers may use original strategies to promote recycling.  Every commercial waste bin asked for service must have a recycling bin of equal size and pickup frequency, according to one transporter.  This makes it quite clear to the generators that if they use the companion recycling bins, they should be able to minimize their wastes by 50%.

3. Payments to franchise contractors

Some garbage companies contend that waste collection and disposal bring in more money because recycling is not covered by city budgets.

The mechanism utilized to pay contractors has changed all that much over the previous 50 years.

Residential services sometimes pay contractors based on the number of families they manage. This provides no incentive to recycle more and dispose of waste more wisely.

Read Also : Complete Steps in Aluminum Recycling Guide

Payments per household are based more on how quickly each family’s trash can be collected than on any other factor. This led to the creation of the compaction truck and the elimination of a highly developed recycling system after World War II.

Other ways to organize payments to contractors for home work could be to pay for each ton that is recycled or disposed of. With increases in recycling tonnage, contractors would earn more money if they were only paid based on the tons they recycled.

Contractors would have an incentive to increase waste prevention and recycling if they were paid inversely in relation to the amount of waste they landfilled.

Cities must compare the advantages of new incentives, such as the ones mentioned above, against the increased costs that would arise from growing unpredictability and risks to the contractors when determining how to pay contractors.

Due to the lack of experience that the majority of contractors have with a waste collection system based on these new incentives, they will need to overestimate the amount they would want to be paid in order to ensure that they have enough room for unforeseen events and contingencies.

In the past, commercial payments to contractors were determined by the quantity and size of bins serviced as well as the frequency of service.  As a result, generators have a compelling incentive to recycle.

However, it is in the hauler’s best interest to suggest the tiniest bins for frequent service. The hauler earns more money the more waste service is requested, regardless of whether it is necessary.

As incentives for haulers who increase recycling, some towns are looking into altering their franchise fee systems. None of them seem to be experimenting with business rates the way San Jose and Seattle have with residential ones. Encourage recycling

In conclusion, the responsibility for disposal payments are one of the motivations for increased recycling when it comes to payment structures for landfill disposal. Contractors will be motivated to discover ways to avoid paying disposal costs if they are required to pay them out of their contract rates. Encourage recycling.